Pages

4/10/14

UConn Huskies: Big Ten's What If

Today, the Big Ten or the Big Ten for those who are not hip with the times, announced they will be putting a second office in New York City. This is likely due to their wider presence as they will be in New Jersey and Maryland this upcoming fall with the additions of Rutgers University and the University of Maryland. But did the B1G make the wrong choice out East?  The National Champions in both Men's and Women's basketball Connecticut Huskies are sitting there in the American Athletic Conference, and Big Ten will rue the day they did not invite UConn.

Now, we all know the reason why they did not invite the Huskies... Academics. UConn is not really known for their academics, and that was much of the reason why the Big Ten decided to go with Rutgers and Maryland versus UConn. It also didn't help the Huskies men basketball team dealt with a postseason ban at the time Big Ten searched for candidates to join the conference. Even if it was just one year, there seemed to be some uncertainty with how things would pan out therefore they looked elsewhere.

The elsewhere teams are borderline dumpster fires in the big sports minus Maryland football because Terrapins are on the rise with Randy Edsall who coincidentally enough was the head coach at UConn a couple years ago. Maryland basketball is a mess with three players transferring out this season including Nick Faust, one of their best players. Rutgers is a pure disaster with basketball due to their piss poor hire of Eddie Jordan, and how they handled the Mike Rice situation. Rutgers football is decent, but not where they were with Greg Schiano.  UConn would be the much more attractive team with their wealth of success in April, and their recent addition of Bob Diaco for their head football position.

While winning the whole damn thing was the pinnacle of the Big Ten's idiocracy, the UConn crowd at Madison Square Garden was all needed to prove Big Ten's decision to be flawed one. Imagine if they had UConn and could put them in the Garden for at least one game of the year. Call it the 'New York Classic' or something like that pitting them up against Michigan State, Ohio State, Wisconsin or Michigan. Could you imagine the crowds for these games? It would be humongous. Rutgers would be lucky to draw a lower bowl crowd for a 'New York Classic.' Big Ten brought Rutgers to the conference to get New York City involved with the Midwest conference, and they failed miserably.

American Conference will be a mid-major next season with losing Louisville to the ACC. Football money reigns supreme, but if Cincinnati and UConn could figure out a way to be independents, could they make the profits in basketball?  Probably not, but what if FOX offers both schools a Notre Dame-like contract where they broadcast all their games and works to find them a spot in a couple bowl games (Obviously for not so much money, but you get the idea). Their basketball teams could come back to the Big East where it is an immediate boost to this conference giving them two more tournament teams, renewing rivalries including Cincinnati-Xavier which would be massive and giving the conference a bigger voice in basketball. Doubt this will happen, but let's hope the Huskies are having discussions about it.

If Maryland or Rutgers turns out to the get a top notch bowl appearance or Maryland ends up in the Final Four (Let's be real about Scarlet Knights basketball), it will be a win for Big Ten's Conference. But if they continue to falter, egg will be directly on their face. Let's be honest, Nebraska basketball getting to the NCAA Tournament was bigger for the conference than anything the football team has done for them during their short time in the Big Ten. UConn is a champion without a strong conference, and that's somewhat amazing in 2014.

Charlie.

16 comments:

  1. You really have to check your facts about Uconn academics. They actually rank higher than 8 of 14 teams in the Big Ten. Who started this notion that Uconn is poor academically? U.S. NEWS ranks uconn in the top 25 academically for public universities... so yeah...

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's really interesting and thank you for the information. I am not trying to say UConn is a bad academic institution rather saying this is why the B1G and the ACC didn't want them in the first place. They had concerns when trying to poach from the Big East and others.

    Related link: http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/03/31/sports-commentary-33114/
    Related link: http://btn.com/2013/06/14/mail-bag-any-chance-big-ten-would-want-uconn/

    Thanks for reading!
    CT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ACC had concerns about UConn academics so they added Louisville?

      Delete
  3. Yes, they had concerns about a school that is rated higher academically than more than half of your conference which prides itself on it's academic demands. OK sure.
    You never once touched on the real reason for bringing in RU and MD. The B1G Network & the cable markets these 2 schools open up for the network whether people actually subscribe or not, the cable systems pay the B1G per subscriber.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right, that's a misfire on my behalf.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tradition has something to do with who the Big Ten selected. That's something Uconn fans can't seem to grasp. Md and Ru have been playing the one sport that counts for decades longer than Uconn who incidentally has a poor overall record compared to either UMD or RU. RU especially has long standing academic relationships with several Big Ten schools as well as on the gridiron. Do they have a stellar football history, no. But it's better than at Uconn and for a much longer time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Charlie, I'd suggest you do some basic research before you show your own stupidity. Both Maryland and Rutgers rank below UConn academically as measured by USN&WR. Neither Maryland or Rutgers can claim 4 NCAA men's Basketball Championships in the last 15 years or 9 NCAA Women's Championships in the last 20 years. All three schools have been to a BCS Bowl in the last few years. UConn would be a great pick for the BiG as it would solidify their market position in the NYC and New England areas in ALL sports and somewhat isolate the ACC as a southern conference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude - RU has NEVER been to a BCS bowl game.

      Delete
  7. Anon... Look I agree with you the addition of UConn would have been great idea for the B1G. I don't know where you are thinking I am riding for the B1G here, I'm on your side. And that's fine, yet neither school had a program get banned from postseason play for academic issues.

    B1G fan - A lot of strong insight there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Again Charlie, please do some basic research. The NCAA arbitrarily changed the APR benchmarks and penalties in August 2011. The only top university that was affected was UConn, some would say due to a personal grudge NCAA President and former UConn Chancellor Mark Emmert had with UConn. Jay Bilas recently said, "UConn's APR ban was the application of an arbitrary standard having no bearing on education. It's like measuring health solely by height." Look, the BiG will evaluate UConn on markets, dollars, and cable subscribers. I just don't like unfair and totally wrong representations regarding UConn's academics. UConn is a very good university.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And, BTW, these UConn kids were punished UNFAIRLY for events that took place when they weren't even at UConn.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Uconn who incidentally has a poor overall record compared to ... RU"

    If you consider 6-6 over the past 12 to be poor?

    2-1 over the last 3?

    How about 2 BE Championships for UCONN vs. Zero vs. Rutgers?

    How about 1 BCS bowl game for UCONN vs. Zero for Rutgers?

    ReplyDelete
  11. There are so many holes in this blog. Might as well take it down.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Rutgers stuff above were things said in the comment section by people were not me. I realize y'all are killing me over the academics comments, but honestly if I did that, does that mean the 14 people that commented were right and I'm wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rutgers has never been to a BCS bowl and is inferior in every facet. The deciding factor is the cable market and contract - it's economics. I has nothing to do with excellence in academics or in sports. If you have a university that has a huge number of alumni - they will watch their team no matter how bad they are (this is the theory - look at some sports teams that had never won anything in 60+ years, look at their fans, enough said). If you look beyond the alumni base, why would you want Rutgers? Rutgers will not bring you the NYC market (NYC hates mediocrity); you will be better off with either Syracuse or Uconn. Everyone knows this. In the ACC Vs B1G battle for NYC, whoever gets UConn will win this war - one or both of these conferences will ask UConn to join soon or risk losing this market to the other. This is the end game.

    ReplyDelete